Posts Tagged ‘oklahoma health insurance’

« Older Entries

Health Care Costs Increase 7.3 Percent In 1 Year

Tuesday, May 17th, 2011

Last week, Milliman released its annual Milliman Medical Index, and it shows that the average American family’s medical costs have doubled in less than nine years and increased 7.3 percent from 2010 to 2011. The results also show that hospital spending, which accounts for 48 percent of total health care spending, accounts for more than 60 percent of this year’s total increase. And, outpatient facility costs increased more than any other component. The medical index illustrates the complexity of the health care cost problem, while legislative remedies to date have focused principally on health plan rate review processes and medical loss ratio restrictions.

Interestingly, a new Yahoo Finance analysis of quarterly financial data shows that the health plan sector of the health care system ranked only 143rd out 215 in terms of profit margin.

Federal

In yet another political statement, a Republican-controlled House Committee last week approved legislation to repeal the maintenance of effort (MOE) requirements for the state Medicaid and CHIP programs. The requirements, which prohibit states from reducing Medicaid eligibility for adults until 2014 and for children until 2019, were passed as part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the federal stimulus bill.  Republicans view the MOE provision as one more example of big government telling the states what to do for yet another entitlement program.  Repealing the provision would reduce Medicaid/CHIP enrollment and save $2.1 billion over 10 years, but it will likely not become law given the Democratic Senate and White House. Its only chance of adoption would be as part of a really big compromise deal on the budget and deficit later this year.

States

CONNECTICUT: State legislators plan to pass a consensus bill creating a Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange by the end of session on June 8. Three exchange bills have cleared committees and differ largely in the make up of their boards.  The Administration supports SB 921 which creates a governance framework for the Exchange, establishing a quasi-public authority with a 13 member board that includes industry representation. The board is charged with making recommendations to the Governor and legislature on Exchange policy issues by January 1, 2012.

The rate review bill is still active and if enacted would: require a lengthy notice timeline for proposed increase, and a public hearing for any increase over 10%; authorize the Healthcare Advocate and the Attorney General to be parties to any hearing; define “excessive” to include consideration of such factors as commissions, transfer of funds to holding or parent company, the rate of return on assets or profitability compared to similar filers, and a “reasonable” profit margin.  Due to the $2.3M annual cost to the state, it does not currently have the support of the Administration. However, a negotiated bill is likely to pass this session.

INDIANA: The legislature has adjourned, and its accomplishments this session include passing a bill that makes changes to eligibility levels in the Medicaid program and ACA-conforming Indiana health insurance law — including coverage of children to age 26, grievances, and rescissions.  The new law also prohibits any requirement that any state resident purchase coverage under a health plan, but it allows residents to delegate to their employers the authority to purchase or decline to purchase coverage under a health plan. The legislature also passed legislation that requires insurance reimbursement for certain services provided by a licensed athletic trainer under the athletic trainer’s scope of practice.  The law also prohibits an insurer from requesting a substitution of a treatment (drug, device or therapy) from an insured’s physician or contacting an insured concerning certain substitutions. The legislature also passed changes to the School Corporation Health Insurance Act that specify new requirements and recommendations for school corporation employee health insurance coverage programs.

KANSAS: The legislature adjourned last week after the Senate approved a budget late Thursday night and the House followed suit in the early hours of Friday morning. The two chambers also agreed to blend 12 health-related bills into a single measure, House Bill 2182. Of interest to Aetna and its customers, the new bill includes a statutory version of the Health Care Freedom Act, which states that no person, provider or employer can be forced to participate in any health care system or to purchase Kansas health insurance. Other provisions would require pharmacy auditors to give advance notice, adopt a (still unfunded) Health Information Technology Act, require changes to the DOI internal and external review procedures (consistent with ACA), require an increase in the high-risk pool’s cap and the addition of children as participants, and prohibit abortion coverage with a separate coverage rider.

MAINE: The Senate voted 24-10 to approve the Individual and Small Group Market Reform bill with several amendments. The bill now goes to the House for concurrence and possibly further amendments. The amended version would:

Expands and alters community rating bands over five years, allowing insurance policies to be more accurately priced according to various risk factors “to the extent permitted by the federal Affordable Care Act” (in amended version);
Establishes a reinsurance program for high cost individuals using existing funding sources, ACA funds as permitted, and a covered lives assessment (capped at $4 for the pool, and $2 for the pool’s net losses, if any, in the amended version);
Allows individuals to purchase insurance in four other states (NH, RI, CT and MA);
Conforms state loss ratios to federal standards;
Repeals the standardized State Health Plan;
Loosens the geographic access standards by allowing insurers to offer incentives to members to use providers based on cost and quality;
Provides a wellness tax credit for employers with 20 or fewer employees;
Permits the creation of captive health insurance associations, and allows smaller businesses (up to 50 employees) to band together purchase insurance.

NEW JERSEY: The legislative proposal put forth by Governor Chris Christie and Senate President Stephen Sweeney to change employee benefits by legislation rather than through collective bargaining continues to get a very cool reception in the Democratic-controlled legislature. The lack of support for the Senate President’s legislation by members of his own party severely limits the bill’s chances of success, given the Democrats’ advantage in both chambers. Reform of public sector health benefits is directly tied to the pending budget, so a resolution is anticipated by early June.

In other legislative news, the Senate advanced legislation to avert an anticipated $300 per employee unemployment insurance tax on employers. This employer tax would be triggered this summer due to the insolvency of the state Unemployment Insurance Fund.  The bill making its way through the legislature would incrementally increase the tax over three years to lessen the immediate financial impact on employers. Also, Commissioner Tom Considine, Department of Banking & Insurance (DOBI), last week expressed the Department’s continuing concern over the implementation of ACA.  He specifically cited the timeline for establishing a state health insurance exchange as a concern.

NEW YORK:  The Senate Insurance Committee and the Senate Banking Committee Chairs each announced that their committees will be considering the nomination of Governor Cuomo’s Chief of Staff Ben Lawsky to be the Superintendent of the newly merged entity for Banking and Insurance to be known as the Department of Financial Services. Prior to joining the Cuomo Administration, Lawsky was a federal prosecutor and special assistant in then-Attorney General Cuomo’s office. He is also a former judiciary counsel to Senator Chuck Schumer. Mr. Lawsky is expected to be confirmed by both Committees. The merged entity would then have a separate Deputy Superintendent for Banking and one for Insurance serving under Lawsky. Those would be appointed positions and do not require Senate confirmation.

With only 16 session days left, there is speculation that the state will not pass enabling legislation for a health insurance exchange. New York can apply for a five-year grant under ACA to create an exchange but only if it has passed key state legislation. Setting up the exchange will be expensive, which is why consumer advocacy groups want New York to be able to access the federal grant money. According to an April 20 state document on planning the exchange, New York anticipates spending at least $52.7 million on planning the exchange between fiscal years 2011 and 2014. The state received a $27.4 million federal Early Innovator Grant award and anticipates receipt of at least another $11.7 million through enhanced federal Medicaid matching funds. The Department of Insurance (DOI) announced it will hold a series of public forums throughout the state in the next two weeks to allow New Yorkers to present their ideas on the design of an exchange.

NORTH CAROLINA: A North Carolina health insurance exchange bill has been accepted and found favorable by first the House Insurance Committee and then the House Appropriations Committee. Committee changes include adding another board member. The bill now also would prohibit the Exchange Authority from imposing penalties and other fees on individuals who cancel enrollment because they become eligible for other coverage options.

OKLAHOMA: The Department of Insurance’s newly created Oklahoma health insurance Exchange Workgroups on Enrollment/Eligibility and Funding both met last week. The Funding group discussed sustainability models and recommendations, as well as the NAIC White Papers on exchange funding. Aetna presented feedback, specifically noting that funding for insurance exchanges should not be limited to insurance assessments and instead should be as broad-based as possible. Exchanges should evaluate all available funding sources to support continuing administrative and operational expenses, including available grants, fees, assessments and taxes. The groups also discussed pending legislation that would create the framework for an exchange, which is still making its way through the legislative process. The session is scheduled to adjourn by May 27, and many now assume an exchange will not be created legislatively until the next legislative session in the spring of 2012.

PENNSYLVANIA: The Senate has unanimously confirmed Governor Tom Corbett’s nomination of Michael Consedine for the post of Pennsylvania health Insurance Commissioner. The vote followed the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee’s unanimous approval of the nomination.  Consedine, who has headed the Insurance Department as Acting Insurance Commissioner since January, previously served as a partner at the law firm of Saul Ewing, where he was Vice Chair of its Insurance Practice Group.  Prior to joining Saul Ewing 12 years ago, Commissioner Consedine served as Insurance Department Counsel.

TEXAS: The House of Representatives gave final approval last week to legislation that extends the life of the Texas Department of Insurance and sets tighter guidelines for the review of rate increases. One key amendment is a page of language that would provide the state some flexibility to proceed on planning for a Texas health insurance exchange. The measure was amended during debate to allow 3-Share programs to be considered qualified health plans even though ACA does not appear to allow for that. The bill now moves to the Senate for Committee debate and floor approval prior to the scheduled adjournment date of May 30.

Governor Rick Perry signed legislation last week that the state’s largest physician organization promoted as a bill that will help rural communities recruit physicians. Sponsored by Sen. Robert Duncan and by Rep. Garnet Coleman in the House, the bill was approved in the House last week and was then signed almost immediately by Governor Perry. The new law will allow critical access hospitals, sole community hospitals, and hospitals in counties of 50,000 or fewer to employ physicians. Most of these hospitals are run by local governments. Texas is one of the first states to statutorily pass clinical protections for physicians who choose employment.

WASHINGTON: Governor Chris Gregoire signed the Health Benefit Exchange bill creating the exchange as a public-private partnership, with operations set to begin in January 2014. The exchange governing board will include nine members recommended by each legislative caucus and appointed by the Governor. Board members will include those with actuarial expertise and representatives of small business, consumer advocacy and identified areas of the health care system. Health insurer representation is not excluded nor specifically required but would be included on a technical advisory committee.

The new law requires the Washington Health Care Authority and the Legislative Joint Select Committee on Health Reform Implementation to apply for federal grants, develop an operational budget, and devise a plan to achieve financial sustainability by 2015.  A work plan and report on operational considerations are both required, addressing topics such as the role of the exchange in aggregating funds, whether to implement a basic health plan option, whether to merge risk pools, certification of and standards for participating plans, and implementation of effective risk management methods.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in connecticut health insurance, health care, health insurance exchange, indiana health insurance, kansas health insurance, north carolina health insurance, oklahoma health insurance, pennsylvania health insurance, texas health insurance | No Comments »

Health Insurance Exchange & Reform Updates

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

Congress returns from a two-week recess Monday, and the federal budget is again expected to quickly become the focus of attention. Just prior to recess, the House passed a budget resolution that proposes to cut the deficit with significant changes to Medicare and Medicare. The latter would essentially be transformed into a voucher program, and some members of the House have gotten an earful from constituents about the proposal during the break. President Obama has come up with his own deficit-reduction proposal, but critics say it does not go far enough. Congress can also look forward to a heated debate over raising the debt ceiling. Some are hoping the so-called “gang of six” will provide a bipartisan answer to deficit reduction, but overcoming the deep political divide within Congress remains a steep uphill climb.

Federal

With Congress on recess last week, there is no Federal report for this week.

States

ARIZONA: Governor Jan Brewer has vetoed a bill that would have authorized cross-border sales of Arizona health insurance in the state. In the weeks since the bill passed out of the legislature, her office was bombarded by both opponents and proponents of the bill, including state Senator Nancy Barto, the bill sponsor and chairman of the Banking and Insurance Committee, whose op-ed on the legislation ran in the Arizona Republic last week. While acknowledging the need for a competitive and vigorous insurance market in Arizona, the governor cited two reasons for the veto: First, a concern that the Department of Insurance would have limited jurisdiction over foreign carriers, potentially putting the state’s citizens at risk; and second, discomfort over the fact that foreign insurers would be able to sell policies free of the mandated benefits legislators had determined should be afforded to consumers.

CALIFORNIA: The Assembly’s Health Committee voted 12-7, along party lines, to approve Assembly Member Mike Feuer’s bill that would allow state officials to reject California health insurance rate hikes deemed “excessive” in the individual, small or large group business segments. The measure would allow state regulators to deny, approve or modify proposed increases in health insurance premiums, deductibles or copayments. In addition, the bill would allow any consumer to intervene in a regulator’s decision by filing a civil lawsuit.  Intervener fees would be paid by the insurer submitting the rate increase proposal. The bill secured the 12 votes it needed to move out of the health committee and will be debated by the full Assembly before the end of June. Similar legislation passed the Assembly last year but was defeated in the Senate. Hospitals, physician groups and business organizations have joined health insurers in opposing the bill.

COLORADO:  After a rocky start, the Colorado health insurance exchange bill passed the Senate by a vote along party lines. It is now in the Republican-controlled House where it has yet to be placed on the hearing calendar. House co-sponsor Amy Stephens is expected to seek non-substantive amendments aimed at reframing the legislative declaration portion of the bill. Rep. Stephens has publically stated her support of an exchange mechanism in the absence of a federal requirement. The goal of the amendments is to provide her with some political cover in the face of expected opposition by fellow Republicans, and the Tea Party in particular, who are opposed to any federal health reform implementation. Also, after circulating late-in-the-session drafts of legislation to bring state law into conformity with the ACA concerning preventive care and adverse determinations and appeals, the Division of Insurance has decided not to file the bills.

CONNECTICUT: Under a legislative agreement with Governor Dannel Malloy announced last week, the Connecticut health insurance SustiNet bill is going to be amended from a broad public option to a more limited version of the Connecticut Healthcare Partnership pooling bill. The compromise removes two pieces of the SustiNet proposal: opening the state employee pool to small businesses and individuals, and offering state-run insurance to the public (the public option). The compromise bill would allow municipalities and nonprofits to enter the state employee plan but not small business or individuals. It also would create a new SustiNet board that would serve in an advisory capacity to the governor on health reform efforts in the state. SustiNet supporters last week held a rally to try to revive their original bill. But the governor is unlikely to agree to a public option, given its very significant costs to the state. When the SustiNet concept was created, federal health reform had not yet passed.  Now that it has, the governor is looking toward ACA as a way to increase access to health care affordably.

MAINE: The Republican Chairs of the Insurance Committee have introduced sweeping health care reform legislation designed to increase consumer options by attracting more carriers to the state and allowing more flexibility in products. The bill would expand rating bands in the small group and individual markets, repeal the geographic access provision that requires plans to contract with virtually every provider in the state, repeal the rule mandating certain standardized benefit plans, return to a file-and-use rate review process, allow captive insurers in Maine, allow cross-border selling in Maine, and create an Individual market reinsurance mechanism to be known as the “Maine Guaranteed Access Plan.” The new reinsurance fund would levy an assessment on all covered lives to fund a portion of the premiums for high-cost claimants. The new assessment would be capped at $4 per covered life. The bill was voted “Ought to Pass” out of the Insurance Committee along party lines.

MONTANA:  Both legislative chambers passed a joint resolution that calls for an interim study on establishing a health insurance exchange. Citing the wide ranging potential implications of not creating an exchange, the resolution requests a legislative council to direct an interim joint committee to consider the feasibility of creating an exchange or participating in a regional exchange. Issues for study include: options being considered in other states; variations on exchange functions; the scope of services to be offered by the exchange; potential for an exchange to facilitate cross-border sales; impact of including an application for a Medicaid waiver to allow premium assistance inside the exchange; whether the exchange should define levels of contributions and plan criteria; feasibility of premium aggregation; and interactions with producers and effect on compensation.  The interim committee would also be charged with studying potential cost savings and the provisions that would be needed to neutralize the cost of state employees participating in the exchange. Following the study,    recommendations will be made to the legislature regarding whether the state should proceed with establishing its own exchange or joining a multi-state exchange.  Stakeholders, including health insurer representatives, will be included in the deliberations.

NEVADA: A bill that would create the Silver State Nevada Health Insurance Exchange has been referred to the Commerce, Labor and Energy Committee but is not yet scheduled for its first hearing. Concurrently, Commissioner Brett Barratt continues to host stakeholder informational meetings across the state. The vast majority of the attendees at the five meetings held to date have been brokers. On another ACA issue, the state was advised that its application for a one-year medical loss ratio (MLR) waiver has been deemed “complete” by HHS. In other business, the Speaker’s rate review bill has passed in the House and is now in the Senate. In its current form, the bill would require prior approval of rates and forms with a 30-day deemer; transparency with completed filings published on the DOI website and all of a carrier’s policies, certificates of coverage and medical loss ratio data published on its own website; public hearings at the request of consumers or insurers; and the establishment of a Consumer Advocate position to represent the public.

NEW YORK: Senate Insurance Chair Jim Seward and Senate Health Chair Kemp Hannon held a roundtable discussion on insurance exchanges last week. About 10 representatives of stakeholder organizations invited to participate and generally urged caution and called for maintaining consumer choice, not creating a new regulatory bureaucracy, including all state mandates, and not incurring additional regulatory burdens and duplications of authority.  The Senate is expected to introduce a fairly lean exchange bill, with the goal of creating a governance framework for 2011. This could take the form of a public benefit corporation or a quasi-public authority, but not a new agency or nonprofit corporation.

NORTH DAKOTA:  The legislature has passed an insurance exchange bill that is expected to be signed by Governor Jack Dalrymple.  This would be the first exchange bill to be passed by a Republican legislature and signed by a Republican governor. The purpose of the bill is to establish a framework for developing more specific policy positions and eventually an implementation plan for the exchange in North Dakota.

OKLAHOMA: A Senate bill that would create an Oklahoma health insurance exchange was filed last week shortly after Oklahoma’s Governor, Speaker of the House and President of the Senate announced an agreement to move forward on the issue. The bill would create the Health Insurance Private Enterprise Network, which would fulfill the stated purposes and functions of a federal exchange under ACA. The bill is short on details but would create a seven-member Board of Directors, including three   gubernatorial appointees (one representing carriers, one representing employers, and one representing providers). The board would also include a consumer representative (appointed by the Speaker of the House, an agent/broker (appointed by the Senate Pro Tem), the Insurance Commissioner (who also serves as Chair), and the Secretary of HHS. The Board will also appoint an executive director. The bill would require as-yet unspecified “public and private funding”, not to include the $54 million early innovator grant from the federal government. The stated goals of the Network are to promote/encourage portability of coverage; promote a competitive, market-based system that includes an aggregate premium system/defined-contribution insurance alternative; encourage carriers and providers to work together to provide quality, cost effective care; and establish a fair and impartial producer referral network for individuals and small employers. The Network would not have regulatory authority, discriminate against any qualified plan, or replace the outside market. Proponents of the bill will attempt passage before the legislature adjourns May 27.

TEXAS:  The Senate unanimously approved Sen. Jane Nelson’s bill to find extensive cost savings in Texas health insurance Medicaid program, the primary health care provider for children, the disabled and the very poor. The measure would expand Medicaid managed care into South Texas, where it has long been carved out. The move is expected to save the state $290 million over the biennium. Pulling prescription drug sales into the managed care program, the changes would require most Medicaid patients to use medicines on a state preferred drug list at a projected savings of $51 million a biennium. And, it would ensure people with disabilities receiving attendant care services at home are using a Medicaid contractor, saving an estimated $28 million a biennium. The measure also directs the comptroller to continue to collect a $5 per-person fee on patrons of strip clubs — a proposal that’s been tied up in court — until a final legal judgment has been reached. The projected cost savings have already been worked into the budget proposal Senate lawmakers are trying to bring to a vote.

VERMONT: The Senate voted 21-9 to approve an amended version of the single-payer legislation that previously passed the House on March 24. The bill will now go to a conference committee. As passed by the House, the bill would establish an exchange by 2014 that would eventually become the foundation for a single-payer system. The single-payer system, Green Mountain Care, would begin in 2017, the year when the ACA allows states to request waivers to opt out of certain requirements as long as an alternative approach would achieve the same coverage goals. The bill would permit earlier implementation of the system, upon receipt of federal approval. Other provisions include new rate review requirements. For rate increases that cumulatively would be 5 percent or greater during the plan year, health insurers would be required to submit a summary that includes a brief justification of requested rate increases, additional information for rate increases of over 10 percent, and any other information required by the insurance commissioner. Senate amendments, however, include a series of requirements that would have to be met before the Green Mountain System can be established, including a demonstration that the system would slow the growth of medical costs. Governor Peter Shumlin has indicated that he will sign either form of the legislation.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in arizona health insurance, california health insurance, colorado health insurance, connecticut health insurance, nevada health insurance, obama care, oklahoma health insurance, texas health insurance | No Comments »

States Resisting Health Insurance Overhaul

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

ARIZONA:

A bill that would require Arizona health insurance carriers to provide written claim reports to plan sponsors up to twice a year, upon request, has been favorably amended in the House to make compliance less onerous. Modeled after a Texas law enacted in 2007, the bill originally required the reports to be provided within 30 days of a request. The type of information that can be requested includes aggregate claims and premium by month, the number of employees covered and pending claims.

Republican-sponsored legislation that would permit cross-border sales of individual health insurance remains in play despite strong opposition by the business community and consumer advocates. The bill would require that out-of-state insurers be subject to the jurisdiction of another state’s department of insurance; maintain reserves not less than the amount required in Arizona; register with the Arizona Department of Insurance (DOI); and that the coverage offered meet, at a minimum, the benefit requirements of the state where the company holds a certificate. The DOI would have authority to revoke the foreign insurer’s registration for reasons that include: inadequate reserves; failure to comply with the unfair practices and fraud statute; and violation of the prompt-pay law. The bill was amended in the House and now goes back to the Senate.

COLORADO:

As the deadline for filing legislation approaches, the Division of Colorado health Insurance released drafts of two bills aimed at bringing the state’s preventive coverage and adverse determination appeal requirements into conformity with the federal health reform law. Health insurers will have a small window of opportunity to provide comments before the bills are formally introduced. Also, a bill was filed to reclassify any product containing pseudoephedrine or ephedrine as a prescription drug to help prevent access to the drug by people illegally manufacturing methamphetamines. The bill has raised strong concerns because it would require a prescription for frequently used allergy medicines and drastically increase medical costs. The sponsor has introduced a joint memorial to Congress requesting the federal government address the issue.

CONNECTICUT:

The fiscal note for the Connecticut health insurance Healthcare Partnership bill, which would allow voluntary municipal and small employer pooling with the state employees’ health plan, has been released and indicates the legislation would be costly to the State. Known costs (those concerning the administration of the program) would be hundreds of thousands of dollars. Other costs that could not be precisely determined include those associated with the public option (similar to the SustiNet legislation but on a much smaller scale) and lost tax revenue from the premium tax.

In other action, the Judiciary Committee passed the Cooperative Health Care Agreements bill out of committee. The legislation would permit health care providers to enter into cooperative arrangements that would not be subject to certain antitrust laws, after approval by the Attorney General. In past years, health insurance plans have successfully argued against action on the bill despite support from the committee’s membership, including both Democrats and Republicans. However, this year the new Chairs have brought the bill forward for a vote. It will now go to the House floor where it will assessed for a fiscal note. The bill still has a long road to travel, including through the Insurance Committee.

FLORIDA and GEORGIA:

The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation and Georgia Department of Insurance have both asked health plans for additional information to help support their requests to HHS for a waiver from MLR regulations under ACA. The requests were prompted by an initial response from HHS asking for the additional information.

GEORGIA:

A bill that includes a prompt-pay provision that would
require third-party administrators to pay for service claims in the same timely fashion as primary insurers, or face penalties, has been passed by both chambers. The bill is opposed by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, as it would erode current employer protections under the federal Employee Retirement Security Income Act (ERISA). The Georgia Chamber will ask Governor Deal to veto this legislation.

MARYLAND:

Governor Martin O’Malley signed several bills into law last week that will impact Aetna insurance and its customers. The Health Benefit Exchange Act of 2011 establishes the Maryland Health Benefit Exchange as a public corporation and an independent unit of state government. The law sets the purposes, powers and duties of the insurance exchange, establishing the Board of Trustees and providing for the qualifications, appointments, terms, and removal of members of the Board. It requires the board to appoint an executive director of the Maryland health insurance exchange, with the approval of the Governor, and determine the executive director’s compensation. The effective date is June 1, 2011. Another law alters the circumstances under which a person has the right to a hearing and to an appeal from an action of the Maryland Insurance Commissioner. The law provides that provisions of federal law apply to specified health insurance coverage issued or delivered by insurers, non-profit health service plans, and HMOs; authorizing the Commissioner to enforce specified provisions of law. The effective date is July 1, 2011.

MICHIGAN:

Newly elected Governor Rick Snyder continues to push for a 1 percent tax on all Michigan health insurance claims, which would require insurers and third-party administrators to pay $400 million in order to generate $1.2 billion in revenue for Medicaid. The tax would replace the existing 6 percent tax on all products among the 14 Medicaid HMOs. The $400 million tax would trigger $800 million in matching funds from the federal government, thereby generating $1.2 billion in total. Should the tax be passed, the Governor promised no cuts to Medicaid reimbursement rates, services or eligibility. The claims tax is the same type being phased out in Maine that was used to fund the Dirigo Health Plan.

MISSOURI:

The attorney general, a Democrat, broke with his party last week and urged a federal judge to invalidate the central provision of the new Missouri health insurance law. The filing of the brief by Attorney General Chris Koster, a onetime Republican state legislator who switched parties in 2007, underscores ACA’s political tenuousness in a critical Midwestern swing state. Koster’s action followed months of pressure from state Republicans that he join attorneys general from other states who are challenging the constitutionality of the law. Instead, Mr. Koster chose to file a “friend of the court” brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. In Missouri, a ballot referendum aimed at nullifying the law was approved by nearly three to one last year, and the legislature recently passed resolutions urging Koster to join the legal challenges. In a letter to the Republican leaders of the legislature announcing his decision to oppose the law, Koster acknowledged that the legislative resolutions, though nonbinding, were impactful as they give voice to the political will of state residents. His central argument echoed those made by plaintiffs in a number of the lawsuits.

NORTH CAROLINA:

Legislation was introduced last week prohibiting most favored nation clauses in North Carolina health insurance contracts. The Insurance Committee in the House has already held one hearing on the bill.

OKLAHOMA:

Governor Mary Fallin last week joined other state leaders in announcing that Oklahoma will establish an Oklahoma Health Insurance Private Enterprise Network to prevent the establishment of a federal health care exchange in Oklahoma. To address concerns expressed by some, state leaders added specific safeguards into legislation to prevent the implementation of a federal health care exchange, while creating an Oklahoma-based health insurance network.  The Health Insurance Private Enterprise Network, based on a concept by the conservative Heritage Foundation and legislation passed by the legislature in 2009, would increase access to portable, private, affordable health insurance plans through a market-based network featuring competition and offering choice to consumers. The network would be governed by a board made up mostly of private sector members and chaired by the Insurance Commissioner.  The network would be funded through state or private resources. The state will not accept the federal $54 million Early Innovator Grant. The legislation is expected to be amended onto a pending bill and make its way through the legislative process. which is scheduled to end May 27, 2011.

TEXAS:

A bill designed to squeeze savings out of social programs won unanimous approval from a Senate budget subpanel last week. The bill includes about 10 ideas for greater economies – primarily in Medicaid but some in food stamps and the Children’s Texas Health Insurance Program. The biggest single savings — $290 million over the next two years — would come from eliminating a South Texas “island” of fee-for-service payments under Medicaid. Since 2003, Cameron, Hidalgo and Maverick counties have been exempt from the managed care trend at work elsewhere in Texas. The bill also would save $51 million by carving prescription drugs into Texas Medicaid managed care programs and requiring most Medicaid patients to use medicines on a state preferred drug list; save $15.9 million by moving children from the State Kids Insurance Program to the Children’s Health Insurance Program; and save $28 million by requiring Texans with disabilities who receive in-home attendant care services to use a Medicaid state program first at a lower cost to the state. The measure now heads to the full Senate Finance Committee, which is crafting its version of the much-reduced budget for 2012-13.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in HHS, MLR, aetna health insurance, affordable health insurance, arizona health insurance, colorado health insurance, connecticut health insurance, florida health insurance, georgia health insurance, health care overhaul, health insurance exchange, health insurance plans, individual health insurance, maryland health insurance, michigan health insurance, missouri health insurance, north carolina health insurance, oklahoma health insurance, texas health insurance | No Comments »

Oklahoma Health Insurance Exchange

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011

Gov. Mary Fallin is defending her efforts to create an Oklahoma health insurance exchange for uninsured Oklahoma residents, explaining that if the state does not have an exchange in place by 2013 the federal government will step in and create its own. Fallin discussed her support for legislation to help create the exchange just four days after a dozen demonstrators carrying signs and American flags protested her appearance before the Tulsa Health Underwriters Association. Her appearance came on the heels of her decision to accept a $54 million federal grant to implement a health insurance exchange. Opponents say creating an insurance exchange is a step toward implementing an unpopular federal health care overhaul law. The House has passed a measure to create an advisory board to help implement an insurance information exchange originally created by lawmakers in 2009. Part of the state’s Insure Oklahoma program to reduce the number of uninsured Oklahomans, the board would identify health insurance plans, what they cover and how much they cost.

Tags: , ,
Posted in health care overhaul, health insurance exchange, oklahoma health insurance | No Comments »

Oklahoma Health Insurance Exchange

Thursday, March 31st, 2011

A bill that defines the membership and appointment process for the Health Care for the Uninsured Board (HUB), which would oversee the implementation of a state Oklahoma health insurance exchange, was approved last week by a 51-34 vote in the House of Representatives. The bill now moves on to the Senate for debate. House Speaker Kris Steele noted that Oklahoma ranks fifth highest in the nation in the percentage of citizens without health insurance, and the state now has the opportunity to construct a system that will provide meaningful access to quality, affordable health insurance coverage. The Oklahoma legislature is expected to adjourn in late May.

Tags: , ,
Posted in affordable health insurance, health insurance exchange, oklahoma health insurance | No Comments »

Health Insurance Reform Issues Student Health Insurance

Tuesday, March 15th, 2011

With a law as complex as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), unintended consequences are always a concern. Last week The Wall Street Journal reported that the physician community is witnessing the emergence of a significant unintended consequence — since tax-advantaged flexible spending accounts can no longer be used to pay for over-the-counter medications without a prescription, under the law, many patients are now visiting their doctors expressly for the purpose of getting new prescriptions for the OTC medications. The change in the law was meant to discourage wasteful spending on some health products and raise revenue. Instead, critics say the provision is driving up health care costs. Unintended consequences of the health care reform law is an area of focus for Aetna insurance, and will continue to urge flexibility in the implementation process to help address potential unintended consequences.

Federal
In response to various requests for clarification (including from Aetna insurance), federal regulators last week issued a Question & Answer document that further refines the previous proposed rule on student health. In short, this clarification makes it clear that nothing from PPACA applies to student health plans until policy years beginning in 2012 or until academic year 2012-2013. The Q & A also clarified that the proposed regulation must be finalized to show what parts of the PPACA would apply to student health plans. This is welcome news in the college and university community. Aetna is communicating with its clients in a manner that is consistent with last week’s clarification, though many schools were hearing conflicting advice from state regulators.

The House-passed continuing resolution includes language that would “prohibit the use of funds to pay any employee, officer, contractor, or grantee of any department or agency to implement the provisions” of the PPACA. In a letter to Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius made several claims that, should the de-funding provisions in the resolution be enacted into law, seniors will lose access to Medicare Advantage plans and other services. Senate Republicans were quick to dispute these allegations stating, the scenarios the Secretary envisions are not allowed under Congressional rules, are not assumed by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and can be prevented by HHS.  Senator Orrin Hatch and Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp also sent Secretary Sebelius a letter expressing their disappointment in what they called the letter’s “baseless allegations,” and expressing hope that “the urgency with which this letter was sent to Chairman Baucus is also being applied in answering a growing backlog of serious questions.”  The CBO also released a letter regarding the impact of the resolution, including the impact of the de-funding provisions on Medicare Advantage. The letter shows the de-funding provisions would have a minimal MA budgetary impact of $5.7 billion over 10 years.

States
Governor Jan Brewer’s Special Advisor on Arizona health insurance Health Care Innovations held a meeting last week with the state’s major health insurers, including Aetna insurance, to discuss identifying IT gaps the state must address to develop the online product selection and enrollment mechanism for an insurance exchange. Social Interest Solutions, the organization that developed the enrollment form currently used by Medicaid applicants, provided a demonstration of that application process. Individual interviews will be conducted with the IT staff of each company to obtain recommendations for the new system.

The Real Estate Committee last week voted out a substitute prior-approval rate bill that retains all the problematic sections of the original bill. The sections of concern cover public hearings, new subpoena powers for the Attorney General and Connecticut health insurance Healthcare Advocate, multiple notice requirements, and new definitions of inadequate, excessive, and unfairly discriminatory. The only change is that the Commissioner would have to promulgate regulations to carry out the proposed public hearing process. The full contingent of Republicans and Rep. Linda Schofield (Dem.) voted against the bill, with Schofield stating that she was concerned the bill gets rid of any timeline under which the Department must act and would require public hearings, nonsensically, for group rates. She also said the bill would provide the Attorney General and Advocate with extraordinary subpoena powers. The Chairs indicated that the bill is a work in progress.

Florida health insurance Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty has disclosed that he will be submitting a medical loss ration (MLR) waiver request to HHS this week.

Georgia health insurance Insurance Commissioner Ralph Hudgens has indicated he will be submitting an MLR waiver request to HHS within a week.  Aetna insurance continues to work with the Chamber of Commerce and plan sponsors to help defeat legislation that would apply prompt-pay requirements to self funded plans, in violation of ERISA.

Oklahoma health insurance Last week State Rep. Mike Ritze, one of two doctors serving in the Oklahoma legislature, called on state officials to turn down $54 million that would be used to implement the new federal health care law. Shortly thereafter, Governor Mary Fallin joined other state leaders in announcing that Oklahoma will accept the grant to help design and implement the information technology infrastructure to operate an Oklahoma health insurance exchange. Fallin listed the creation of such an exchange as one of her top priorities in her State of the State address earlier this month. She and others announced their support for the grant after working with state agencies to ensure that no unworkable federal mandates were included.

Later in the week, the legislature continued taking steps forward to reduce the number of uninsured Oklahomans. House Speaker Kris Steele authored a bill that defines the membership and appointments to the Health Care for the Uninsured Board (HUB), which is designed to establish a system of counseling, including a website, to educate and assist consumers in selecting an insurance policy that meets their needs.  The seven-member HUB consists of representatives from the Insurance Commissioner’s Office, the Oklahoma Healthcare Authority, insurance companies, agents and also consumers. The purpose of HUB is to implement a market-based insurance exchange.  The bill passed the House Public Health Committee at the end of the week and will proceed to the floor of the House.

Texas health insurance Legislators are wrestling with to what extent they should intervene in what residents eat, drink and breathe. In a state with some of the nation’s highest obesity and diabetes rates, supporters of various proposals say they are trying to give Texans more ways to combat unhealthy decisions by others, as well as make good choices for themselves. The president of the Texas Medical Association testified last week in favor of a bill banning the sale of unhealthful drinks (sugary fruit juices, sodas, whole milk) to students during school hours. Other related bills would allow the state to raise taxes on sweet sodas and fine restaurants for not posting nutritional information.

About 30 percent of Texas schoolchildren are obese or overweight, according to the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy. And last month, Republican Comptroller Susan Combs released a report saying obesity cost Texas businesses $9.5 billion in 2009 — that could rise to $32 billion by 2030 due to the cost of health care services, absenteeism, decreased productivity and disability. Legislators will continue debate on these bills until the session adjourns on May 31.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in aetna health insurance, arizona health insurance, connecticut health insurance, florida health insurance, georgia health insurance, health care reform, health insurance exchange, oklahoma health insurance, student health insurance, texas health insurance | No Comments »

States Fight Back On Health Care Reform

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

When the nation’s governors came calling at the White House last week, President Obama greeted his guests with the offer of new flexibility toward implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The President said he is willing to give states an earlier opportunity to opt out of certain key requirements of the law, but only if the states can find their own way to cover as many people without added costs. If Congress agrees to the new approach, states could gain exemptions by 2014 rather than 2017. But a number of governors expressed skepticism that the proposal offers them any real benefits, given the difficulty states would have meeting the President’s caveats. Some prefer to continue to pursue outright repeal. Still, the change in timing means exemptions could be earned in the same year that some of the most controversial provisions of the law go into effect. And, with the governors’ immediate focus on rising Medicaid costs, the proposal reportedly would let states send HHS officials a combined request to alter Medicaid and their approach to health care reform.

Federal
Last week a Florida federal judge clarified (at the request of the Obama Administration) his earlier decision back in January 2011 in which he ruled that the PPACA’s individual health insurance mandate is unconstitutional. He also wrote that the mandate could not be severed from the rest of PPACA and, therefore, the whole law had to be set aside as unconstitutional.  In last week’s rather colorful ruling, the judge chided the government for sitting on its hands for weeks before asking for the clarification. He re-emphasized that the mandate and the whole law are unconstitutional and chastised the government both for failing to appreciate, as a matter of law, that the prior Declaratory Judgment was the “functional equivalent” of an injunction (meaning that the government could not proceed with implementation) and for having the temerity to suggest otherwise. The judge did not stop there, which would have halted all implementation of the PPACA had he done so. He instead decided that the government’s motion to clarify was also a motion to “stay” the imposition of the original ruling, and he granted the stay.  But he conditioned it with the requirement that the government file an appeal within seven days seeking an expedited “fast-track” appellate review, either in the Court of Appeals (11th Circuit) or the U.S. Supreme Court. This filing requirement is the major takeaway from last week’s ruling because it accelerates the timeline for the litigation, to the applause of the state and others who oppose the law. The Administration and the proponents of the law are less happy, since stringing out the ultimate decision would make it more difficult, if not impossible, to dismantle.

With House approval (314 to 112) last week, Congress is well on the way to repealing the 1099 provision of the PPACA, which imposes a costly and burdensome reporting requirement on employers.  Earlier this year, the Senate also voted to repeal the 1099 provision; however, the two chambers are worlds apart with respect to paying for the repeal. While the House version pays for the repeal by revising the rules for repayment of excess premium subsidies down the road, the Senate version doesn’t directly pay for it and only gives OMB the authority to go find the money. A House-Senate Conference (or an unofficial compromise) will be needed to resolve this impasse.

The anticipated government shut-down on March 4 was put off last week when both chambers passed (and the President signed) a two-week extension of a continuing resolution to keep the government officially funded until March 18.  This particular resolution actually cuts federal spending for the current fiscal year by $4 billion, which means that the House Republican savings target of $60 billion for FY 2011 is now down to $56 billion. Congress could very well bump along with such short-term resolutions throughout the spring. But at some point, the Republicans in the House and the Democrats in the Senate will have to permanently fund FY 2011 and get on with the FY 2012 budget, which is supposed to be in the works right now.
Multiple health-care-related hearings were held on Capitol Hill last week. In testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour voiced support for funding Medicaid with block grants, under which the federal government would give states a set dollar amount for Medicaid rather than paying a percentage of costs. Under this system, states would have “total flexibility” to manage their Medicaid programs, according to Barbour.  The panel’s Democrats were quick to dismiss the idea of block grants, saying the change would harm vulnerable beneficiaries. Karen Ignagni, the President and CEO of America’s Health Insurance Plans, testified before the House Ways and Means Committee Subcommittee on Oversight Health Plan Programs to Combat Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. Her testimony addressed two issues: how health plans’ fraud detection units are using cutting-edge techniques to identify practices leading to substandard care – including overuse, underuse, or misuse of medical treatment; and suggestions for improving fraud detection and prevention in both public and private programs.  Part of her testimony also focused on the medical loss ratio (MLR) regulation, which she said will hurt the insurance industry’s efforts to detect and prevent fraud.

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) last week released a study that shows “nearly 10 percent all Medicare payments are fraudulent or otherwise improper, and the government isn’t doing enough to stop them.”  The Medicare “fraud margin” is 9 percent, nearly triple the profit margin for the health plan industry (3.58 percent). The GAO also provided correspondence to the Hill on Medicare Private Sector Initiatives to Bundle Hospital and Physician Payments for an Episode of Care.  As one of the five largest national payers, Aetna insuranceae was interviewed and provided relevant materials. The GAO found that ongoing private sector bundling initiatives that achieve savings are an important consideration, in light of Medicare’s financial challenges. Bundled payments are feasible for Medicare, but there are several obstacles to overcome — such as manual claim processing systems, resistance to limiting provider choice and the lack of standard definitiions.

States

With the California health insurance deadline for the introduction of legislation during the 2011 session looming, and now passed. several health care-related measures were reintroduced, such as a single payer/universal care bill, prior approval and rate regulation, and mandatory autism coverage. In addition, a host of bills are in play that take another step toward implementing federal reform but appear to be inconsistent with PPACA. As in past years, legislators have proposed a host of new mandated benefits – 15 in total. They include several new ones, including the proposed elimination of step therapy for pain medications, fertility preservation services and forensic medical evaluations. The state’s mandate commission is reviewing the cost and public benefit of each of these proposed mandates and will issue a report that should be publicly available by the end of March.

Democratic Senator Irene Aguilar, the sponsor of a Colorado health insurance single-payer bill, engaged in a verbal confrontation last week with a representative of the Colorado Association of Industry and Commerce regarding the potential impact of her bill on employment in the state. Subsequent to a rally on the steps of the Capitol, the bill was voted out of committee, 4 to 3, along party lines. The bill has little hope in the Republican-controlled House and may not reach the Senate floor without some Republican support.

As in the past two years, the Connecticut Health Insurance Committee approved Speaker Chris Donovan’s bill called An Act Establishing the Connecticut Healthcare Partnership. This bill would open the expensive state employee health plan to small businesses, nonprofits and other groups. The goal is to attract a number of new employee groups to the state employee plan – nearly all of whom already have health insurance. In addition, the new state-run health plan would compete directly against the private marketplace. Given the high benefit levels, state employee plans are among the most expensive in the state. As such, this bill would not offer small businesses any real cost relief, achieve intended cost savings or increase the number of people with insurance. It could lead to substantial cost increases for taxpayers. The 11-9 committee vote was mostly along party lines, with most Democrats supporting the measure (except Sen. Joan Hartley and Rep. Linda Schofield), and all Republicans opposing it. This bill passed in 2008 and again in 2009, but was vetoed both times by former Governor M. Jodi Rell.

The Governor and Commissioner of Georgia Health Insurance are considering issuing an executive order that would create an Exchange Review Board. The Board would then consider and possibly develop legislation to implement a state insurance exchange in 2012. A bill is expected to be filed creating this advisory committee and is supported by the Governor’s office. The Governor may then follow with an executive order. Also, Aetna insurance expects an MLR waiver request to be filed by the DOI sometime this month.

The Department of Louisiana Health Insurance has indicated it will file an MLR waiver request this week despite indications from the Governor’s office that he does not approve of the request.

The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Oklahoma Health Insurance and Human Services passed a bill last week that would create a website to permit Oklahomans to see approximate pricing information for medical procedures and pharmaceutical products. The bill requires the Insurance Department, in collaboration with the State Department of Health, to establish and maintain an online health care information system that permits consumers to see pricing information from different types of providers and pharmaceuticals. The bill states that the purpose of the website is to serve as a resource for insurers, employers, providers, purchasers of health care and state agencies to continuously review health care utilization, expenditures and performance. It would also enhance the ability of consumers and employers to make informed, cost-effective health care choices. The bill would require that the presentation of data in the system allow for comparisons in the context of geography, demographics, general economic factors and institutional size.

Also of interest is a bill passed by the Senate Rules Committee last week that would allow Oklahoma to opt out of federal health care reform requirements. The bill asserts state control in the regulation of health care, would create a compact between certain states and would set forth formulas for figuring the right to federal funds for each member state. The bill also would create the Interstate Advisory Health Care Commission and establish membership requirements and duties of the commission. Primarily the commission would assist the legislatures of member states in the regulation of health care. It states the formation of this compact is contingent upon approval from the U.S. Congress. Democrats in Oklahoma’s Senate opposed the bill, some saying that it would force Oklahoma to rely on other states for regulating Oklahomans. Both bills will continue through the legislative process, which is scheduled to end in late May.

Rep. John Zerwas’ bill authorizing the creation of a state Texas health insurance exchange encountered mostly smooth sailing last week when it was heard by the House Insurance Committee. Going by the name of the Connector in the bill, the primary purpose of the exchange is to prepare Texas for changes in health insurance markets set to roll out in three years as part of federal health system reform. One important change in the new bill language presented at the hearing was the absence of an individual mandate to buy an insurance product. Groups expressing support for the bill included the Texas Association of Business and the Texas Hospital Association, among others. The bill was left pending by the Committee and will likely see more changes before it is brought to a vote. The Texas legislature continues in its regular session until June 1, 2011.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in aetna health insurance, california health insurance, colorado health insurance, connecticut health insurance, georgia health insurance, health care overhaul, health care reform, health insurance exchange, individual health insurance mandate, louisiana health insurance, obama care, oklahoma health insurance, texas health insurance | No Comments »

The Real Deal On Health Insurance Reform

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

Without being too specific, President Obama signaled a willingness to consider changes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) during his State of the Union speech last week. The only detail referenced, though, was the proposed elimination of a tax-reporting provision of the law that is unpopular with small businesses because of the new administrative burdens it creates. The provision mandates that small businesses provide a 1099 form to any entity from which they purchase more than $600 in goods and services, starting in 2012. The proposed elimination drew bipartisan applause during the speech. But if both sides of the aisle appear to like that particular revision, it is far less clear that consensus can be reached on any of the other proposals floated so far. A new survey shows that Americans remain divided on the health care law, with the percentage having an unfavorable view of the law growing. But the survey also found that a majority of Americans are opposed to using tactics such as blocking appropriations as a means to slow or undercut implementation of the law.

A pattern seems to be developing on the House side of Congress as Republicans are now flexing their majority muscles via Congressional hearings aimed at questioning the legality and practicality of the health care reform act passed in 2010. It was the Ways & Means Committee’s turn last week as the committee heard from two small business owners who expressed concern about future health insurance costs, their ability to maintain current levels of coverage, and barriers to expanding and hiring new employees. Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI) noted the inherent conflict of imposing new taxes (e.g., on insurers) and expecting cost containment nonetheless. Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) discussed the importance of the individual health insurance coverage requirement, emphasizing that the success of market reforms is closely linked to bringing everyone into the system. Austan Goolsbee, Chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisors, testified regarding the Administration’s expectation that the new law will succeed in holding down costs, and he highlighted the value of the small employer tax credits.  On the flip side, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former CBO Director and President of the American Action Forum, cautioned that the law frontloads new taxes and backloads new spending, thereby creating the illusion of federal deficit reduction. Holtz-Eakin testified that the law will have a detrimental impact on employment, wages, and economic growth.

Another health care hearing last week was held by the House Budget Committee, which focused on the fiscal consequences of the health reform law. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), the committee chairman, emphasized that “health care spending is driving the explosive growth in our spending and our debt.”  He criticized the new law as a “centrally planned, bureaucratically run health care system” and expressed interest in building bipartisan support for policies that create incentives to enhance quality, reduce costs, and promote patient satisfaction. Richard Foster, chief actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), testified that the health reform law (from 2010 through 2019) will increase national health expenditures by an estimated $311 billion, or 0.9 percent, compared to prior law. He also discussed the impact of Medicare funding cuts and indicated that some of the savings may be “unrealistic.”  Foster expressed particular concern about productivity adjustments for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies, stating that simulations by his office suggest that roughly 15 percent of Part A hospital providers would become unprofitable within 10 years as a result of the productivity adjustments.

Arizona health insurance : While the legislature is focused primarily on the budget and the governor’s request for a Medicaid waiver, bills are beginning to be introduced. Of interest are: a proposed requirement that state employees be offered a wellness program as part of their health benefits; a mental-health parity mandate; a proposed requirement that the sponsor of a benefit mandate review data evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment or service; and a proposed exemption of health-care-sharing ministries from regulatory oversight on the premise that such practices do not constitute the business of insurance.

California health insurance : As the legislature continues to introduce bills in advance of the February 18 deadline, several repeat bills have already been introduced, including mandates on mental health, acupuncture and maternity services. A new mandate has been proposed to require health plans to cover fertility preservation services for cancer patients. The legislation, sponsored by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, would require coverage of services such as ovarian suppression, freezing of eggs and ovarian tissue, and fertility services after treatment of the cancer.

Illinois health insurance : A formal health insurance exchange bill has not yet been introduced for consideration in the General Assembly. However, the Health Insurance Rate Review Act has been introduced to create an independent, quasi-judicial Health Insurance Rates Review Board to determine whether proposed “insurance rates are reasonable and justified.”  The bill sets forth duties and prohibited activities concerning the board, and it would allow the Governor to make all of the appointments.  The bill would set requirements and procedures that health insurance carriers must follow in filing current and proposed rates and rate schedules, and it would allow the new board to review and approve/reject all rates and rate schedules filed or used by a carrier. Rate standards, public notice, and hearings are all addressed. The General Assembly is expected to consider quite a few bills and hold hearings on both exchanges and rate review during the current session.

Oklahoma health insurance : Last week the Department of Insurance held a meeting of the Oklahoma State Healthcare Exchange as a first step in the creation of a strategic road map. The Department announced the creation of Key Advisory Work Groups to develop recommendations on exchange-related issues.    Each work group and sub-group will be responsible for researching and developing recommendations on language to be used for the development of a strategic plan during the next three months. The key issues of study will include: governance and administrative structure, eligibility process and infrastructure,  enrollment, information technology, carrier and plan selection,  financial management, and education and marketing. Stakeholders attending the meeting were asked to volunteer to participate on groups for which they have knowledge and leadership experience. The Department hopes to assign volunteers to their preferred committees in the next few weeks so that workgroup meetings can get underway.

Texas health insurance : While publicly affirming his opposition to the federal health care reform bill, Rep. John Zerwas is explaining health insurance exchange legislation he drafted through an op-ed piece published in multiple major newspapers in the state. Zerwas argues that Texas could be forced to cede regulatory control of a significant chunk of its health insurance market to the federal government if it fails to create its own exchange this session. He explained that a desire to avoid such oversight has generated broad support for his bill from groups that include the Texas Association of Business, Texas Hospital Association, Texas Medical Association, Texas Restaurant Association and two Texas health insurance industry groups, as well as Republicans and Democrats in the legislature. Though supportive of efforts by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and others to have the health care bill ruled unconstitutional,    Zerwas said his connector proposal is about bringing down the cost of coverage by promoting competition and ensuring that Texas families and Texas employers have the right to choose their own coverage. He called passage of the bill good policy, regardless of whether PPACA is repealed, replaced or unfunded. The legislature will debate the bill during the current session, which will end June 1, 2011.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in arizona health insurance, california health insurance, health care reform, health insurance exchange, illinois health insurance, individual health insurance, obama care, oklahoma health insurance, texas health insurance | No Comments »

Oklahoma Health Insurance Plugging a $6.8 billion Hole

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Oklahoma health insurance seeking to plug a $6.8 billion hole in the state’s budget, the House forwarded one of several “revenue enhancement” bills to the Senate, which promptly adopted the bill and sent it to Governor Brad Henry. The bill would impose a 1 percent fee on all health insurance claims paid. It would apply to third party administrators, HMOs, self-insured plans, excess carriers, stop loss carriers, multiple employer welfare arrangements, professional employer organizations, and the state employee program. The revenue would be used to fund the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, which administers the state’s Medicaid program. Questions persist as to whether the measure will withstand a likely court challenge on the grounds that the Oklahoma constitution states that no tax increases may be passed during the last five days of the session. Also, if a tax increase is not approved by three-fourths of both legislative chambers – it was not – then the increase must be put to a statewide vote. If signed, the bill will go into effect on July 1.

Additionally, a conference committee released compromise language on the topic of the state’s employee health plan. The bill would change the existing Board to become the “Oklahoma Health and Wellness Board” with a HealthChoice Health Insurance Division within it. The new 11-member board is required to contract with a web-based, doctor-patient mutual accountability incentive program for 2011 and establish a wellness program for all participants in the plan including financial incentives for participation in the wellness program and healthy living practices. The board would be required to contract with only one HMO. This bill now requires the Governor’s signature to take effect.

Tags:
Posted in oklahoma health insurance | No Comments »

Oklahoma Health Insurance Congress Prohibits Reform

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

The Senate passed three measures last week opposing the national health insurance plan. This included an amendment that will prohibit participation in forcing residents of Oklahoma to buy individual health insurance. The amendment is a response to plans of President Barack Obama and Congress in reforming the United States health insurance system.

The amendment passed the Senate 30-16. It included five Democrats backing the Republican proposal. Oklahoma health insurance advocates are sending a message to the white house that they don’t agree with Obama Care.

Tags: , ,
Posted in health care reform, obama care, oklahoma health insurance | No Comments »

« Older Entries